Legal Opinion

United States v. GIRALDI

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 16, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02830Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil Action No. 20-2830 (SDW) (LDW) Plaintiff, v. OPINION FRANK GIRALDI, Defendant. March 16, 2021 WIGENTON, District Judge. Before this Court is Defendant Frank Giraldi’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345, and 1355. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391. This opinion is issued without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78. For the reasons…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API