Legal Opinion

In re Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 9, 2003No. 2002-B-2698PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

JjPER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Charles Williams. We previously suspended respondent from practice for a minimum term of two years. Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Williams, 498 So.2d 727 (La.1986) (“Williams F). Our judgment in Williams I provided that respondent could petition for and obtain reinstatement at the end of the two-year period, provided" that he had fulfilled certain conditions;1 however, if respondent *354had not fulfilled all of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re CortigeneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  2. In Re GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  3. In re GerdesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. In Re GerdesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  5. In re CallahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API