Legal Opinion
Kalish & Rice, Inc. v. Regent Air Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 25, 1985No. 85 Civ. 3600 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kalish & Rice, Inc. (“K & R”) has moved for summary judgment against the defendant Regent Air Corporation (“Regent”) pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P. seeking payment of $260,000 for advertising and marketing services allegedly rendered by K & R. For the reasons stated below, which constitute the findings of fact and conclusions of law, K & R’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.
Facts
Summary judgment may be granted only where there are no genuine issues of material fact. Rodrigues v. Village of Larchmont, New York, 608 F.Supp. 467, 471…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,164 Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Bache & Co., Inc. v. International Controls Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Rodrigues v. Village of Larchmont, New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- APC Commodity Corp. v. Ram Dis Ticaret A.S.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997