Barnett v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, 0-
The plaintiff alleged for his cause of action against the defendants :(a) That the plaintiff was walking along a pathway close to the track of the defendant which was used by members of the public as a passageway over the premises of the defendant with the knowledge and acquiescence of the latter.(b) That the plaintiff traveled along the pathway on the premises of the defendant to a point where it intersected a dirt road which crossed the railway tracks of the defendant.(c) That while the plaintiff was on the crossing the defendant wrongfully backed one of its trains without…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chambers v. Van WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Winans v. HareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Reid v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. EnglishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Conaway v. BoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Kelly v. CannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942