Legal Opinion

Barnett v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1926No. 17187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, 0-

The plaintiff alleged for his cause of action against the defendants :(a) That the plaintiff was walking along a pathway close to the track of the defendant which was used by members of the public as a passageway over the premises of the defendant with the knowledge and acquiescence of the latter.(b) That the plaintiff traveled along the pathway on the premises of the defendant to a point where it intersected a dirt road which crossed the railway tracks of the defendant.(c) That while the plaintiff was on the crossing the defendant wrongfully backed one of its trains without…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Van WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Winans v. HareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Reid v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. EnglishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Conaway v. BoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Kelly v. CannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API