Legal Opinion

Harleysville Insurance Companies v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 2002PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

In this insurance coverage dispute, Appellant The Harleysville Insurance Companies (“Harleysville”) and Appellee Aetna Casualty and Surety Insurance Company (“Aetna”) disagree as to the priority of coverage between their respective insurance policies. We granted allocatur, limited to the following issues: (1) whether the Superior Court erred in determining that a driver’s personal policy of motor vehicle insurance provides coverage that is excess to the vehicle owner’s personal blanket excess policy; and (2) whether the Superi- or Court disregarded the basic nature of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. CastegnaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lexington Insurance Company v. Western Pennsylvania HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Ali v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Hydropress Environmental Services, Inc. v. Township of Upper Mount BethelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. TIG Insurance v. Tyco International Ltd.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API