Legal Opinion

Hagen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1925No. 4351PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Hagen, Pielow, Givens, and Brown were jointly indicted and tried for conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1013814 ct seq.). Brown was acquitted; Hagen and the others were convicted. Hagen brought writ of error.

Upon the trial a prohibition agent testified that he with other agents went to the dwelling house at 122 Broadway, Seattle, and there served the search warrant upon defendant Hagen, who was in the house, and that upon a search of the house for liquor he found beer and gin in Pielow’s room. Counsel for defendants objected to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Veeder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
  3. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Rene RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Marron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. United States v. Charles T. MaudeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. SandsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
  5. United States v. SpallinoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API