Legal Opinion
Cheyenne Publishing, LLC v. Starostka
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 2004No. 03-168PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Appellants, Cheyenne Publishing, LLC, and Larry and Nancy Lovelass (collectively Cheyenne Publishing), filed a complaint seeking damages from Appellee, Ar-dith Starostka (Starostka) for defamation, intentional interference with contract, and interference with prospective contractual advantage. The district court granted Starost-ka’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis that it lacked personal jurisdiction over Starostka. Starostka is a resident of Nebraska, and it is conceded that she did not physically set foot in Wyoming as it pertains to this litigation.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meyer v. HattoWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Amos v. Lincoln County School District No. 2Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Tep Rocky Mountain Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, F/K/A Wpx Energy Rocky Mountain, Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability Company v. Record Tj Ranch Limited Partnership, a Wyoming Limited PartnershipWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Wagner v. ReuterWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Black Diamond Energy Partners 2001-A Ltd. v. S & T BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.