Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brawner v. Brawner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 14, 1959No. 46319Published

1DissentHollingsworth, Chief Justice

I must respectfully dissent from the opinion adopted in this case by the Court En Banc. My reasons for so doing are well stated in an opinion submitted in Division Two by Stockard, C., which, omitting the first and last paragraphs thereof, I, with his consent, adopt as my dissenting opinion. It follows:

It is undisputed that at common law neither spouse could maintain an action against the other for a tort committed during coverture. Rogers v. Rogers, 265 Mo. 200, 177 S.W. 382, 383; Willott v. Willott, 333 Mo. 896, 62 S.W.2d 1084, 89 A.L.R. 114; 41 C.J.S. Husband and Wife § 396; Harper &…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Brown v. GosserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  4. Peters v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Brandt v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API