Legal Opinion

(PC) McDaniel v. Lizarraga

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 1, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01136Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH LEON MCDANIEL, No. 2:19-cv-1136 JAM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds through counsel in this civil rights action filed under 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Crooks’ motion to dismiss is fully briefed.1 As discussed below, 19 the undersigned recommends that the defendant Crooks’ motion be granted. 20 The Verified Complaint 21 At all times relevant herein, plaintiff was incarcerated…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API