Grange Insurance v. MacKenzie
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentDore, J.
(dissenting) — The majority holds as a matter of law that the car was furnished for the regular use of petitioner. Because this holding is based solely on the petitioner being contemplated as the only driver of the car and his operation of the vehicle 4 to 6 times a month, I dissent.
In this appeal, Grange Insurance Association contends that the car was used frequently by George and, therefore, the exclusion applies. George contends that the automobile was used infrequently and only with James' permission and, therefore, it follows from Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Ward, 83 Wn.2d 353, 517 P.2d 966…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Giokaris v. KincaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Allstate Insurance Company v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. FallsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Juzefski v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.