Legal Opinion

Sommer v. Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 9, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01140Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BRIAN SOMMER, Case No. 3:23-cv-01140-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. REGENCE BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF OREGON, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Brian Sommer (“Sommer”) filed this action against Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon (“Regence”) seeking a determination of his rights to medical benefits and to recover such benefits, and other equitable relief, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API