Legal Opinion

State v. Lozano

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2008No. 27,527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} This case is another in which we are called upon to determine whether the State met its burden to demonstrate that its dismissal of a complaint in magistrate court followed by the refiling of the same charge in district court was not done for bad reasons or to circumvent the six-month rule. In contrast to State v. Rayburns, 2008-NMCA-050, 143 N.M. 803, 182 P.3d 786, cert, granted, 2008-NMCERT-004, 144 N.M. 49, 183 P.3d 934 [ (No. 31,021) (April 18, 2008) ], and State v. Carreon, 2006-NMCA-145, 140 N.M. 779, 149 P.3d 95, cert, quashed, 2007-NMCERT-008, 142 N.M. 436,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Delgado v. StanleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. HeinsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. NealNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. BoltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. YatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. PulitiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. YatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. YatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API