Legal Opinion
Novich v. Rojtman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.
Two defendants move to strike the amended complaint as not properly served or, in the alternative, to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that the court has not jurisdiction of the subject of the action or, in the alternative, to dismiss the amended complaint in the exercise of discretion, on the ground that the cause of action asserted concerns the internal management and affairs of a Wisconsin corporation and involves the application of the laws of that State.
For the reasons stated in the memorandum on the companion motion addressed to the original complaint decided herewith, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Weiss v. RouthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Cohn v. Mishkoff Costello Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Koster v. Shenandoah Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Broida v. BancroftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- O'Brien v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Sterling v. Seeman Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.