Legal Opinion

Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & Pollok

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 31, 2003No. 00 Civ.3151 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Steven Hoffenberg (“Hoffen-berg”) has moved for reconsideration of the Court’s October 23, 2003 opinion. See Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & Pollok, 288 F.Supp.2d 527 (S.D.N.Y.2003) (the “October 23 Opinion” or “Hoffenberg I”). The October 23 Opinion granted defendant Hoffman & Pollok, now known as Hoffman Pollok & Pickholz LLP (“HPP”), summary judgment and denied Hoffenberg’s cross-motion under Rule 60(a) and (b) seeking recusal. The October 23 Opinion further granted Hoffenberg thirty days to submit any additional facts and HPP another ten days to reply to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Range Road Music, Inc. v. Music Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Griffin Industries, Inc. v. Petrojam, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  4. Stull v. BayardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Banco De Seguros Del Estado v. Mutual Marine Offices, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoffenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Broker Genius Inc. v. Seat Scouts LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. The Fashion Exchange LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API