Teresa D. v. City of Fruitland
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Chief Justice.
The City of Fruitland (“the City”) adopted Ordinance No. 388, which provided an exclusive garbage collection and hauling franchise to Hardin Sanitation, Inc. (“Hardin”). The ordinance also provided that it was a misdemeanor for anyone else to engage in garbage hauling services. Teresa and Matt Plummer (“Plummer”) operated a competing sanitation business and the City enforced the ordinance by citing and arresting Plummer’s employee for collecting and hauling garbage. The ordinance was later repealed. Plummer sued the City, raising antitrust claims and a claim for tortious…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Highland Enterprises, Inc. v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Sandpoint Water & Light Co. v. City of SandpointIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Plummer v. City of FruitlandIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Linda Ciszik v. Kootenai County Bd of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Ciszek v. KOOTENAI COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Teresa D. v. City of FruitlandIdaho Supreme Court · 2003