Legal Opinion
United States v. Metzger
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 28, 2000No. 00-5055PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
We consider whether a “bodily injury” enhancement may be applied pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2B3.1(b)(3)(B) to increase a defendant’s sentence where the relevant injury was inflicted by a police officer. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), we conclude that a sentence enhancement under these circumstances is appropriate.
I
Defendant-appellant Jack Eugene Metz-ger, Jr. was convicted of robbing a police credit union in Tulsa, Oklahoma in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On appeal, Metzger argues that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phillips v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Abdul-Aziz Rashid MuhammadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jose P. MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Andre Tony WallsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Jerry Jay Fitzwater, (89-3557/3593), Clayton Colwell, Jr., (89-3556)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Antonio DonabyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. FortierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.