Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 7, 2012No. 2011-CA-0990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.
11 This appeal arises from a trial on the merits for the four class representatives in a class action proceeding resulting from injuries caused from exposure to carbide lime dust. Following a two-week bench trial, the trial court allocated fault amongst the defendants pursuant to multiple theories of recovery and awarded damages to each class representative. The defendants and their insurers alleged that the trial court erred regarding the right to a jury trial, the admission of an expert’s testimony, medical causation, an award to a class representative for scarring,…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Duvio v. Specialty Pools Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Thebault ex rel. Thebault v. American Home Assurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Gaspard v. Horace Mann Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Calvin J. Hill, Individually and as the of the Succession of Elnora Johnson Hill v. TMR Exploration, Inc., Park Exploration, Inc., and Vitol Resources, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
- Gibbs Construction, L.L.C. v. National Rice Mill, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.