Legal Opinion
Thuman v. Clawson & Wilson Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, J.:
This defendant is a large dealer in boys’ and men’s garments, and had large quantities of them manufactured by outside parties. The plaintiff owned sixty power sewing machines and manufactured boys’ garments. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract for such work, which was to take effect August 1, 1919, and run to December 31, 1920. The pertinent parts of that contract read as follows:
“First. Party of the first part [this defendant] agrees to order hereunder sufficient merchandise to keep sixty power sewing machines constantly operating during each month of the duration…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Varney v. . DitmarsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- United Press v. . New York Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Rosenthal Paper Co. v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- E. Heller Brother v. . Continental MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Griggs v. Renault Selling Branch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Steranko v. Inforex, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Wolff & Munier, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Computer Possibilities Unlimited, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Specialties Development Corp. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953