Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Keasling ex rel. Keasling v. Keasling
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 14, 1989No. 88-803PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
Rickey Keasling’s employer was served with a copy of an order by the Child Support Recovery Unit (CSRU) in Wapello County for mandatory income withholding pursuant to Iowa Code section 252D.1(3) (1987). The order stated that Keasling was *119$19,800 delinquent in his child support payments and that the employer would be required to withhold portions of Keasling’s wages to be applied on the future child support installments and on the arrearage. A copy of the order was sent to Keasling, who filed a motion under section 252D.2 to quash the withholding order.
Keasling’s motion to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers, Local Union No. 238 v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Iron Workers Local No. 67 v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Cedar Rapids Human Rights Commission v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Georgia Department of Human Resources v. WordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Allee v. GochaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Morgan County Dhr v. B.W.J. A.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Hammond v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.