Legal Opinion

Smilowitz v. Russell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 1984No. 84-220PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether, as the court below ruled, the shop rule exception to the dangerous instrumentality doctrine recognized in Castillo v. Bickley, 363 So.2d 792 (Fla.1978), relieves the vehicle owner of liability to an injured party where, as here, the injury-causing operation of the vehicle occurred not during the servicing or service-related testing of the vehicle, but rather as a necessary concomitant to the service to be performed.

The facts are not in dispute. Smilowitz, a pedestrian, was struck by a vehicle owned by Russell. At the time of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Castillo v. BickleySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Jordan v. KelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Fry v. Robinson Printers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Patrick v. Faircloth Buick CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Harfred Auto Imports, Inc. v. YaxleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. Estate of VillanuevaSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Ratliff v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API