Youngblood v. Estate of Villanueva
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We initially accepted review in Estate of Villanueva v. Youngblood, 927 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), based on alleged conflict with Michalek v. Shumate, 524 So.2d 426 (Fla.1988); Castillo v. Bickley, 363 So.2d 792 (Fla.1978); Fought v. Mullen, 609 So.2d 726 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Roberts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 498 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Smilowitz v. Russell, 458 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); and Fahey v. Raftery, 353 So.2d 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Upon further consideration, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Castillo v. BickleySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Michalek v. ShumateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Estate of Villanueva v. YoungbloodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Fahey v. RafteryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Roberts v. UNI. ST. FIDELITY & GUAR.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ratliff v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016