Robinson v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Robert D. Robinson, appeals from the Order of the Superior Court reversing the Order of the Court of Common Pleas. The Superior Court found that the trial court erred by choosing Mr. Robinson instead of Appellee, Mrs. Rochelle L. Robinson, as the primary custodian when it found that both parents were equally capable of assuming primary custody of their child Robert William Robinson (“Bobby”). The issue before us is whether the Superior Court misapprehended the scope of appellate review as established in Mumma v. Mumma, 380 Pa.Super. 18, 550 A.2d 1341…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Holtz WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Mumma v. MummaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by20 opinions
- Charles v. StehlikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Johns v. CiociSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- R.M.G. v. F.M.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- E.A.L. v. L.J.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Landis v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.