Freda Smith v. City of Hapeville

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Freda Smith, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:24-cv-1002-MLB v. City of Hapeville, Defendant. ________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff’s complaint asserts claims for “FMLA interference” (Count 1), “FMLA retaliation” (Count 2), ADA “disparate treatment” (Count 3), and ADA “retaliation” (Count 4). (Dkt. 1 at 8–11.) The Magistrate Judge recommends granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on these claims because Plaintiff did not address or defend them in her response to Defendant’s motion.…