Legal Opinion

Pullara v. Hed

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 6, 1950No. 16150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hilliard

A suit in partition by defendant in ° error, plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error, defendant below. Plaintiff set forth two causes of action in his complaint, the first cause pertaining to real property, and the second to personal property, adequate description attending in each instance. The trial court found that “plaintiff and defendant are tenants in common both as to the realty and the personalty involved herein, and that each are entitled to an undivided one-half interest therein.” Judgment consistent with such findings, and not challenged as to form, was entered.

In the first…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oppegard v. OppegardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Gateway Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. Larson v. HindsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Hed v. PullaraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Arch A. Edwards Post No. 252 v. GouldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Farinash v. Tuscany 2 Residential, LLC (In Re Martin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API