Arch A. Edwards Post No. 252 v. Gould

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Doyle.

*335The parties are here in the same order they appeared in the trial court where plaintiff in error was plaintiff in an action seeking to have a deed executed by it and delivered to the defendant Gould, declared to be a mortgage. Following a trial to the court, judgment of dismissal was entered pursuant to Rule 41 b, R.C.P. Colo.

As grounds for reversal, plaintiff contends that the evidence conclusively established that the deed was not a conveyance but a security device, and that the court erroneously found to the contrary.

Negotiations between the Regular Veterans…