Legal Opinion

Torelli v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1940Published

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff a substantial sum of money in an action which was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries. Two causes of action are set forth in the complaint. The first charges negligence and the second breach of a statutory duty (see Schmidt v. Merchants Dispatch *554Transportation Co., 270 N. Y. 287); both charge that the defendant’s wrongful acts caused injury to the plaintiff’s lungs which resulted in pneumoconiosis. The case was submitted to the jury on both causes of action but the jury was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Teller v. Prospect Heights HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Butler v. . G.F., S.H. F.E.S.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. De Puy v. QuinnNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Santee v. Standard Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API