Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hall
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Howard Circuit Court; James F. FUiott, Judge. Action by Millard F. Hall against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment on a verdict for the plaintiff for $1,800, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
The facts upon which appellee’s alleged cause of action is predicated are that on and prior to June 12, 1903, the Pittsburg Glass Company operated a large manufacturing plant at Kokomo, and in connection with its plant had yards with a number of railroad tracks laid therein, which yards were enclosed by a high fence and entered through a gateway, which was kept closed and locked when not in use. The keys to the gateway were in the possession of appellant. All of these tracks were laid, owned and used exclusively by appellant, said tracks having been placed there by consent of the glass…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hargreaves v. DeaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Eaton v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Eason v. S. & E. T. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. KolbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- East Hill Cemetery Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Indianapolis Motor Speedway Co. v. ShoupIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- Dempsey v. TestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- United States v. Stewart M. Alexander, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Indianapolis Southern Railroad v. TuckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.