Legal Opinion

Nottke v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 6, 2018No. Case No. 3:17CV544PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

James G. Carr, Sr. U.S. District Judge

This nuisance case arises out of defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company's operations at its Moorman Yard in Bellevue, Ohio.

Plaintiffs, whose homes are adjacent to the yard, allege that Norfolk Southern's use of a retarder system to decelerate rail cars generates "extreme noise pollution." They contend that the retarders produce "a very loud, unbearable high-pitched squealing sound" when the retarders' metal brake shoes press against the cars' steel wheels. (Doc. 30 at ¶ 10). Among the relief plaintiffs seek is an injunction "enjoining Defendant from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Adrian & Blissfield Railroad v. Village of BlissfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
  4. Delaware v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Pace v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Belt Railway Company of Chicago v. Weglarz Hotel III, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API