Legal Opinion

Brill v. Cherwin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 58, Calendar 46,863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The lead paragraph of appellants’ statement of facts, set forth in their brief, reads as follows :

“The parties to this record have referred to one another by names which facilitated understanding the complicated facts, and this practice will be followed : The appellants, William J. Short and Marie J. Short, his wife, who intervened in the court below, will be called ‘Shorts.’ The appellees, Glenn W. Vannoy and Genevieve Vannoy, his wife, who also intervened in the court below, will be called ‘Vannoys.’ The plaintiffs and appellees, Annabel M. Brill and Robert Brawn, and the defendant and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacNicol v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Barnard v. JennisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Curtiss v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Brewster v. Martin Marietta Aluminum Sales, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Felters Co. v. Local 318, Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union, AFL-CIOMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API