Curtiss v. Sheldon

Complainants filed a bill to redeem. Decree was entered for them, and defendant appealed to this Court, which affirmed the decree below. Curtiss v. Sheldon, 47 Mich. 262. The case was remanded for an accounting, and complainants now appeal from the decree fixing the amount due to the defendant. The accounting was in exact accord with the first decree, which was affirmed by this Court. Complainants now attack this decree on two grounds, viz.:

1. Because it allows the defendant 10 per cent, on his loans to them.

2. Because it holds defendant accountable for the rents actually received, instead of…