Legal Opinion
Mann v. Georgia Department of Corrections
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 21, 2007No. S07A1043PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.
This case involves a constitutional takings challenge to OCGA § 42-1-15, which prohibits registered sex offenders from residing or loitering at a location that is within 1,000 feet of any child care facility, church, school or area where minors congregate (the “residency restriction”), id. at (a), or being employed by any business or entity located within 1,000 feet of any child care facility, church or school (the “work restriction”). Id. at (b) (l).1 Appellant Anthony Mann is a registered sexual offender,2 see OCGA§ 42-1-12 (a) (20) (B), *755who previously challenged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Duffield v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Joshua Vasquez v. Kimberly FoxxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Diversified Holdings, LLP v. City of SuwaneeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- State v. PollardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Mann v. Georgia Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- People v. MosleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.