Legal Opinion

Lussier v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Peabody

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 12, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

The zoning board of appeals of Peabody (board) granted a variance that permitted a homeowner to construct “an addition (22' x 22' attached garage)” with a sideyard setback of one foot, instead of the required twenty feet. Several years later, the homeowner sought and obtained a building permit to construct a second story on the garage that exceeded its “22' x 22' ” footprint and was to be used as living space. After the second-story addition was built, the board ruled that a new or modified variance was required. That ruling was reversed by a Superior Court judge, who entered summary judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  2. DiGiovanni v. Board of Appeals of RockportMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Town of Warren v. FrostSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  4. Mendoza v. Licensing BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. Mendes v. Board of Appeals of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Furlong v. Zoning Board of Appeals of SalemMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Cornell v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Timperio v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  4. Fanning v. Bd. of Zoning Appeal of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Spear v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API