Legal Opinion
James E. Foreman v. Department of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 23, 2001No. 00-3195PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
James E. Foreman petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board denying his petition for enforcement of a settlement agreement provision requiring the Army to register him in the Department of Defense (“DOD”) priority placement program. Foreman v. Army, 85 M.S.P.R. 247 (M.S.P.B.1999) (final order). Because the Board did not err in determining that the Army was excused from performance of the registration provision and that the Board had no authority to order the DOD to register Foreman or award damages for nonperformance, we affirm.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Foreman was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- West v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jill K. Massie, as Mother and Next Friend of Autumn Massie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Walter G. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eloise Fomby-Denson v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Sinclair Oil Corp. v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Cunningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Authority of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to Impose Monetary Sanctions Against Federal Agencies for Failure to Comply With Orders Issued by EEOC Administrative Judges, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.