Legal Opinion

Haight v. Hoyt

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Civil action for slander; brought to the Superior Court, and tried to the jury upon a general denial and a justification, before Beardsley, J. Verdict for the plaintiff for $4,000 damages, and appeal by the defendant on the ground of excessive damages. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPark, C. J.

The only question of importance in this case is, whether a new trial should be granted on the ground that the damages assessed by the jury are, in legal contemplation, excessive ? The jury at first returned a verdict for the sum of $6,738.37, which the court refused to accept, and returned the jury to a further consideration of the case on the question of damages, telling them that in the opinion of the court their verdict was too large.

They afterwards returned a verdict for the sum of $4,000, which was accepted by the court, and the verdict recorded.

The first verdict clearly shows that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Darrow v. LangdonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Hassett v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  3. Doroszka v. LavineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Noxon v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  5. Craney v. DonovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API