Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. Barnes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Ingbam. Trover. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, O. J.

Barnes brought trover for the conversion by defendant of a steam-engine, balance-wheel and some other things pertaining thereto.

This property was purchased by Luther A. Ingersoll from Barnes and W. S. George, and according to the written agreement the price agreed upon was $600, one hundred of which was to be paid in cash, and the balance in three equal annual payments, the first to be made one year thereafter, and for which a promissory note was given. It was also agreed therein, that after the cash payment was made Ingersoll should be allowed to take the engine and put it in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knowlton v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pettyplace v. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wickes Bros. v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Jenks v. ColwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Parnell v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lasch v. Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API