Legal Opinion
Scott Tinsley, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 6, 2026No. 3:24-cv-09427Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT TINSLEY, et al., Case No. 24-cv-09427-AMO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is the government’s motion to dismiss the Petition filed by Scott Tinsley, 13 and his stepfather, William Jeffrey Oliver, acting pro se, against the United States and the Social 14 Security Administration (“SSA”). Having considered the papers filed by the parties, the relevant 15 legal authority, and good cause…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- 27 soc.sec.rep.ser. 313, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 14915a Charles Briggs v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 447, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 605 Jyotika Patel Mohanbhai Patel v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Clifton J. Rogers, Ins, Acting District Director, Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Charles Hironymous v. Dr. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- LAURIE Q. v. CallahanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997