Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Fisk

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 9, 1942No. Gen. No. 41,807PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

Rehearing Opinion.

2Opinion of the Court · HebelJustice Hebel

In passing upon a rehearing that was allowed to the defendant Clarence Hoklas, one of the defendants in the above entitled cause and to which the plaintiff filed an answer, we will consider the questions as they are presented by the parties.

It has been suggested by this defendant that the legislature has seen fit to allow recovery for accidental injuries to a guest in an automobile only in case of injuries through wilful and wanton misconduct of the operator of the motor vehicle and that ordinary negligence on his part will not give rise to a cause of action to a guest.

In…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Streeter v. HumrichouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Clark v. HasselquistAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  4. Rajek v. CummingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mroz v. Vasold, Jr.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. Scott v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Barnes v. LackeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Silberman v. Washington National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API