Legal Opinion

Minns v. Crossman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motions to set aside verdicts and for new trials.

1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, J.

Motions to set aside verdicts and for new trials on the ground of the erroneous exclusion of testimony offered by defendant. There are two actions. One is brought by the administrator to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by defendant’s malpractice as a dentist; the other by the intestate’s husband for damages due to loss of services, etc., between the alleged malpractice and the death of the intestate. It was claimed that defendant was negligent in extracting teeth of the intestate, causing one of them to go down her windpipe, thence into her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Littlewood v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Clift v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Griswold v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Abbott v. . DoughanNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Abelein v. PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. WoolstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Dellefield v. Blockdel Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. In re the Estate of McArdleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  4. Rouse v. TomasekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API