Legal Opinion
Kamerman v. Ockap Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 23, 1986No. 81 Civ. 2977 (SWK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Norman Kamerman seeks to maintain a class action against Ockap Corporation (“Ockap”), Dealers Underwriters of New Jersey, Inc. (“Dealers”), Madeline Colasurdo, Lewis Colasurdo and Pakco Companies, Inc. (“Pakco”) (together, “defendants”) under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23(b)(1), (2) and (3) on behalf of all persons who were stockholders of Pakco immediately prior to its merger into Ockap in 1977. This action was originally brought by David Kamerman, now deceased, Norman Kamerman’s father. By order dated January 7, 1986,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Korn v. Franchard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Carlotta Rossini and Jane Zukofsky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Ogilvy & Mather, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Arthur Barnes v. Meyer Osofsky, Alfred N. Greenberg v. Aileen, Inc., Reginald Smith v. Aileen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Greenspan v. BrasslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- In re Frontier Insurance Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- In re VMS Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Dubin v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.