Legal Opinion

Arthur Barnes v. Meyer Osofsky, Alfred N. Greenberg v. Aileen, Inc., Reginald Smith v. Aileen, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 1, 1967No. 30867-30869_1PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.

Aileen, Inc. is engaged in the design, manufacture and sale of popular priced sports wear for girls and women. Prior to the fall of 1963 it had outstanding 1,019,574 common shares; 205,966 of these, most of them covered by a 1961 registration statement, were traded on the American Stock Exchange, #and the balance, 813,608, were owned, in approximately equal proportions, by two officers and directors, Osofsky and Oberlin. Pursuant to a registration statement effective September 10, 1963, a group of underwriters offered at $23.375 per share, substantially the then market…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Colonial Realty Corporation v. Brunswick CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  4. Barnes v. OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. In Re Livent, Inc. Noteholders Securities Litig.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API