Legal Opinion

Carrington Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 23, 1973No. C.D. 4415PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAO, Judge:

These actions, consolidated at the trial, involve Flextrack-Nodwell tracked motor vehicles imported with Mayhew drills, in assembled or unassembled condition. In Court No. 70/55515 the drill was not physically attached to the tracked vehicles but was shipped on the same flatbed truck and was mounted on the vehicle immediately after importation. The drills in Court No. 70/55516 were mounted on the tracked vehicles prior to importation. The tracked vehicles per se were manufactured in Canada by Flex-track-Nodwell, Ltd., and, except as to the one in Court No. 70/55515, were assembled…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herbert G. Schwarz, Dba Ski Imports v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. The United States v. Oakville CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. The United States v. Standard Brands Paint Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. Carrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Carrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API