People v. Jones
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
The only real question on this appeal is whether on the basis of defendant’s offer of proof in support of his motion to quash the jury venire, he should have been permitted to offer evidence that the jury panel from which the trial jury was about to be drawn was illegally constituted, We hold that the trial court erred in foreclosing defendant’s offered proof. Nothing in this opinion must be construed as a holding or dictum to the effect that the composition of defendant’s trial jury was, in truth, the result of an unconstitutional selection process.
Facts
An information…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. TrevinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. SzymanskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.