Falkenburgh v. Jones
Indiana Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a rule against the clerk of the Tippecanoe Circuit Court to show cause why a mandamus should not issue against him, &c.
1Opinion of the CourtHovey, J.
FalkenburgKs attorneys filed affidavits for a mandamus against Mark Tones, clerk of the Tippecanoe Circuit Court. At the November term, 1853, of this Court, a *297rule was entered against said Jones, requiring him to show cause why a mandamus should not issue returnable at the succeeding term.
The facts shown by the affidavits and the answer to the rule, are, that Falkenburgh was indicted for grand larceny at the August term, 1853, of the Tippeccmoe Circuit Court. That Court permitted him to defend in forma pauperis, and assigned him counsel. He was tried and convicted, and prayed an appeal to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rubottom v. M'ClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
- McCormick v. President & Trustees of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lane v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Campbell v. Criterion GroupIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Bynum v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.