Legal Opinion

Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC v. Jim Hudson Superstore, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 2010No. 4666Published

1Opinion of the CourtGeathers, J.

Appellant Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET), brought this declaratory judgment action against Respondent Jim Hudson Superstore, Inc., d/b/a Jim Hudson Toyota/Scion (Hudson), Dyer, Inc., d/b/a Dick Dyer Toyota (Dyer), and Appellant Anderson Columbia Acquisition, LLC, d/b/a/ Toyota Center (Anderson) to determine whether the relocation of the Toyota Center dealership in Lexington County is exempt from protest pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 56-15-46(C) (2006). 1 Hudson and Dyer filed counterclaims asserting protests to the proposed relocation under subsection (B) of the statute. SET and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API