Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gomes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 9, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The defendant, Kevin Gomes, appeals from a default and an assessment of costs on the default entered against him in the District Court because he failed to pay a fine in a timely manner. The defendant claims error in (1) the assessment of costs on the default; (2) his summary confinement pursuant to the default without a hearing or representation by counsel; and (3) the Commonwealth’s refusal to permit the default costs to be “worked off” pursuant to G. L. c. 127, § 144 (1988 ed.).

The Commonwealth concedes that the defendant was entitled to a hearing at the time of the default and asks that…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brangan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. City of Worcester v. SigelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. CleggMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. PayneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API