Legal Opinion
City of Worcester v. Sigel
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 29, 1994No. 93-P-1472PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
To avert a fire hazard, the fire department of Worcester, acting under G. L. c. 148, § 27A, 2 § 38A, and 527 Code Mass. Regs. § 9.22 (1992), issued an abatement order on February 9, 1993, to the defendants, Manuel and Jerome Sigel, trustees of the S & G Nominee Trust (the trust). The order required the trust to restore to working condition the sprinkler system at 85 Lafayette Street and 66 Ellsworth Street (the premises), a property the trust owned, and to remove underground storage tanks on the premises.
When the trustees failed to comply with the order, the city brought civil proceedings in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Morrison v. LennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Apahouser Lock & Security Corp. v. CarvelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vittands v. SudduthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- ROPT Ltd. Partnership v. KatinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Steele v. KelleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Arno v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Zuroff v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.