Legal Opinion

Adams v. Curtis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1894No. 16,656PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the White Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.

On the 6th day of November, 1891, the appellees brought an action against the appellants in the White Circuit Court for the purpose of setting aside an alleged conveyance of about one hundred and twenty acres of real estate, made by the appellant, John H. Adams, indirectly through Samuel D. Sluyter, to his wife, the 'appellant, Rebecca E. Adams, as fraudulent and void as to the appellees, who were creditors of the appellants John H. and John A. Adams, and for the expressed purpose of making said real estate liable for the payment of several judgments held severally by the appellees against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brookville National Bank v. KimbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Dice v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Callan v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. Brower v. GoodyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Brigham v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kiefer v. KlinsickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State Bank v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Heiney v. LontzIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Peterson v. MettlerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1912
  5. Armstrong v. Peoples State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API