Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Lyders

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1933No. Docket No. 9094PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Upon petition it was ordered that a writ of supersedeas issue in the above matter and that appellant present to the presiding judge of the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco for approval as to their sufficiency a bond or bonds to stay execution. Bonds were presented to said presiding judge and were by him approved and filed in that court.

Plaintiffs contend that the bonds were improperly filed. They have also filed exceptions m this court to the sufficiency of the sureties, and have asked for an order setting aside the order of said judge of the superior…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Halsted v. First Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Nonpareil Manufacturing Co. v. McCartneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Segarini v. BargagliottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Messenkop v. DuffieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Foster v. FernandesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API