Warren v. Warren
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal by the orator from the decree of the court of chancery dismissing his bill. The facts of the case are sufficiently disclosed in the opinion of the court. -for the orator.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Poland, J.
The orator’s bill is brought to foreclose a mortgage executed by Amos Warren to Amos W. Warren, on the 13th of January, 1843, to indemnify the mortgagee against a note signed by him with the mortgagor, for one thousand dollars, to Hugh Henry, which mortgage was assigned to the orator in 1851.
The defendant Chandler claims the premises covered by the mortgage, by virtue of a levy and set off of the equity of redemption of Amos Warren, upon an execution in favor of John Pettes, in 1852, of which - he was the owner, and by subsequent conveyance…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber, Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)District Court, D. Vermont · 1991
- Fife v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- McMahon v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1880
- Costello v. TaskerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.