Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Russell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice

delivered the opinion of the court.

The statute, (Thomp. Dig., 184, 185,) declares that the widow “shall be entitled to dower in the following manner, to-wit: one-thiTd part of all the lands, tenements and here-ditaments, of which her husband died, seized and possessed, or had before conveyed, whereof said widow liad hot relinquished her right of dower.”

It is contended that the appellee was not entitled to dower *182under the terms oi' the statute, because her husband did not die “seized and possessed'” oi the land in which she claims dower; and that he had not “before conveyed"…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. FinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Mills v. . Van VoorhiesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Astor v. HoytCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  4. Eslava v. LepretreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Clark v. MunroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hull v. BurrSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Walker v. CloseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Evins v. Gainesville National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. Bush v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  5. Fisher v. VillamilSupreme Court of Florida · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API